Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving C urban bus vehicles.

On November 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:09, and driven the above vehicle at around 30 to 40km in speed, according to the intersection of the 92-om of the amb, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, and the four-lanes in the direction of the ambling in the direction of the ambling in the direction of the ambido.

At this point, since a signal is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with good faith by living well the right and the right of the front.

However, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to change the signal to a stop signal, and due to the negligence of proceeding with it, the victim D, who was driven by the victim D pursuant to the left-hand turn at the right right-hand turn in the opposite part.

E The right side of the vehicle was completely received from the above vehicle.

After all, the defendant suffered injury, such as salt dynasium, in which the victim should receive approximately two weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. A yellow dust survey report and signal cycle chart;

1. A CD (victims and videos);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The main point of the argument was that the victim entered the intersection when his direction signals are red and left turn to the left. As such, even if the defendant entered the intersection in which his direction yellow signal is yellow, such a violation of signal does not directly cause the traffic accident in this case.

2. Determination

(a) The signal apparatus indicated in Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.