logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.10.04 2018나201529
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) D Large 645 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Pakistan-si.

As to E, the transfer registration of ownership was completed in the future; however, upon the death of E, the instant land is the F, G, and H (hereinafter “F et al.”)’s heir as to the shares of 1/3 shares on February 13, 2012 due to inheritance by agreement and division as of August 14, 201.

(2) On February 6, 2014, I and J purchased the instant land from F and two other parties on February 5, 2014, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to each of the above land’s 1/2 shares on February 6, 2014. After which J sold to K on August 5, 2016 during the litigation under the following sub-paragraph (c), 1/2 shares owned by it and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the above land’s shares.

B. 1) On the ground of the instant land, housing in an unregistered state and warehouse buildings (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant building”).

(2) On January 10, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B to purchase the instant building at KRW 19,000,000 (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the broker of Defendant C, and on the same day, paid KRW 19,00,000 to Defendant B, and KRW 1,00,000,000 to Defendant C respectively.

3) After delivery of the instant building, the Plaintiff occupied it together with L, a father, and leased part of the said building to M and occupied part of M. Meanwhile, on March 21, 2014, I and J filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, L, and M seeking removal, removal, removal, etc. of the instant building (Seoul District Court 2014Kadan949, hereinafter “related lawsuit”). On March 24, 2016, the said court rendered a favorable judgment that “the Plaintiff removed the instant building to I and J, and delivered the site for the said building, and L, M, as L, I and J respectively removed from the instant building.”

2 For this, the appeal was filed by the plaintiff, L, and M in the District Court 2016Na4274, K. K.

arrow