A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:00 on July 15, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (in the case of a set-off) driven a Cobserver car and proceeded with a road of one-lane in front of a public elementary school in front of the public elementary school in the original city, which is located in 1365 in the original city.

The Defendant had been using the victim D (49) car driven in the same direction. As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to secure a certain distance and to safely operate the car in preparation for the case of the suspension of the said car. However, the Defendant failed to do so and went away without taking measures, such as providing rescue to the injured party by occupational negligence, which attempted to stop the said car rental car without neglecting it. The Defendant received the part behind the left-hand part of the said car rental car from the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle to the front-hand part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle. At the same time, the said victim suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc. of the trend requiring treatment for a approximately one week period, and at the same time, the repair cost of KRW 92,158 of the said car rental car was damaged to the point of time, but failed to rescue the injured party by immediately stopping it.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) proceeded with 250 meters as it was after having paid the above accident at the time of the above day, and proceeded with the road of the “G” store in the “G” store in the “G” store in the original city at the time of the original city.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving service, has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and thoroughly, but the Defendant neglected this duty and neglected to do so, and due to the occupational negligence of driving the center line, and due to the victim H(61) driving that was proceeding in the opposite direction, the Defendant was placed in the front part of the victim H(61) driving car driving in the opposite direction, and the Defendant was placed in the front part above the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim H needs to be treated for about two weeks.