Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2010, the Defendant wanting to establish and operate a static point from a person with no name (one person B) name (one person B), and would provide daily allowances and KRW 50 million within three years if he/she lends his/her name of business registration to another person.

After hearing the phrase “B”, accepting the proposal, and then, at the D community service center located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, issued various documents, such as resident registration, abstract, and certificate of seal impression necessary for the registration of the business operator under the name of the defendant at the D community service center located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the head of the Dong-gu Tax Office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, and registered the livestock product sales business operator in the name of the defendant for “G” located in the 1st floor F of the building in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government by using the above documents.

On February 25, 2010, “B” in name is to pay the face value to the victim H without a mold until March 10, 2010 after supplying the scrap to F E in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul by telephone.

“.....”

However, in fact, “B” did not intend to operate a normal stop point in which the supplied meat is sold to consumers, and then deducted the supplied meat from other places, and then was thought to close the door immediately. Therefore, even if the supplied meat is supplied by the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

In this respect, “B” in the name of the victim refers to the victim’s false statement as above, and is equivalent to KRW 7,082,350 at the market price around March 3, 2010; and KRW 6,456,197 at the market price around March 6, 2010; and

3. 9. He received the supply of static meat equivalent to 19,129,335 won in total in the market price on three occasions, including a sum of 5,590,78 won in the market price, and acquired it by deception.

The Defendant, “B” as above, is deemed to be a clerical error in the facts charged in relation to “45,31,580 won” in this part of the facts charged, which led the victim to the mistake of “19,129,335 won”.

In taking advantage of a considerable amount of money, ..