1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. As to the cause of claim

A. On December 1, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) to lease various temporary items to be used for the new construction of D Building (hereinafter “instant construction”). The written contract states, “In the event of returning temporary items after the completion of use, the destroyed items are not repaired shall be compensated in cash according to the unit cost of the estimate for compensation if they are disposed of and destroyed,” and the written contract states, “The unit cost of the leased items including value-added tax, the unit cost of the leased items, the unit cost of the destroyed items, and the unit cost of the destroyed items are attached to the Plaintiff.” Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), as joint surety of the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., signed on August 31, 2012, the Plaintiff returned each of the following items to the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd.’s respective 20,671,377 and each of the following items are repaid by the end of the month.”

3) After the creation of each of the instant notes, the Defendant Company paid the Plaintiff the rent additionally until April 12, 2013. The rent that has not been paid up to now is KRW 10,000,50, and the temporary materials that have not been returned after lease are the same as the detailed statement in the attached sheet, and the value thereof reaches KRW 3,973,200, including value-added tax (hereinafter “instant fee”).