Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.
, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The "2015 Highest 15.1528" C (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) is a vocational owner who operates a commercial entertainment business establishment (hereinafter referred to as the "place of business") in accordance with subparagraph 1114 of the D Building 114 and subparagraph 204 of the "E Buildings" in the Yananan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Incheon. Defendant A is the "head of office" who comprehensively manages the main business establishment, and Defendant B is the "head of office" who instructs female employees who reported and promised interview.
In collusion with C, from August 13, 2014 to October 21, 2010, the Defendants employed female employees, such as F, at the instant establishment from around October 13, 2014 to around October 21, 201: (a) received 13 to 140,000 won from male customers who reported and contacted advertisements posted in the Internet site G, “H” and “I”, and paid 90,000 won out of them to female employees; and (b) made female employees engage in commercial sex acts, such as arranging sexual traffic.
"2015 Highest 1574" C is a vocational owner who operates a sexual traffic business establishment (hereinafter referred to as this case's establishment) under Article 203 of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City J building 201, and Defendant A is the head of the office who comprehensively manages this case's establishment, and Defendant B is the head of the office who performs the role of guiding female employees by reporting the interview of female employees and guiding female employees.
The Defendants conspired with C, from October 2014 to January 31, 2015, Defendant A employed female employees from the main place of business from around February 20, 2015, and from February 20, 2015, Defendant B engaged in the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. by having female descendants, who reported advertisements posted “H” to “G” on the Internet site, and paid 14-150,000 won among them to female employees, and paid 9-1,000 won to them.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution
1. Each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the Defendants, C, F, and K
1. Seizure records;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;