logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.07.30 2015가합30930
제3자이의
Text

1. For each movable listed in the separate sheet:

A. Defendant MNS Capital Co., Ltd. Doo, Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 15, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into the instant security transfer contract into an authentic deed of a monetary loan agreement for transfer security (hereinafter “instant contract for transfer security”) with the content that a notary public takes over each of the movables, etc. listed in the attached Table, which were owned by Doo Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “each of the instant movables”) in order to secure a loan claim of KRW 600,000,000 against Doo, Inc. as a law firm No. 1231, 2012, by means of the Plaintiff’s possession and amendment.

B. Notarial Deed No. 1 of the Defendants: (a) Defendant MNS Capital Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. in writing a notarial deed for a loan for consumption of money on September 27, 2013, in order for a notary public to secure a loan claim amounting to KRW 250,000,000 against Defendant MNF Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant double security loan agreement”) by virtue of the acquisition of each of the instant movables, etc., owned by Defendant MNS Capital, by means of an occupancy or amendment, and the debtor’s failure to perform the above loan obligation, the said agreement is concluded to recognize that there is no objection even if compulsory execution was carried out (hereinafter “the instant double security agreement”).

(2) The notarial deed was drawn up. 2) As between Doo on August 27, 2014, Defendant Southern SM Co., Ltd. in the Notarial Deed No. 381, a notary public recognizes that there is no objection even if he/she is immediately subject to compulsory execution when he/she delays the payment of a promissory note in which the date of payment of the notarial deed was written in Kim Jong-si.

arrow