1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet

A. Defendant C is the permanent resident registration office of the Daegu District Court. Defendant C is the permanent resident registration office of the Daegu District Court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into a title trust agreement with Defendant C in September 201, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant C with the Daegu District Court’s permanent resident registration office received on September 28, 201, under the name of the Defendant C, with the size of 831 square meters, F 1957 square meters, G 110 square meters (hereinafter “number”).

B. On January 18, 201, E, 1441 square meters was divided into 806 square meters prior to E, 563 square meters prior to H, and 47 square meters prior to I. B. All E was divided into 806 square meters prior to E on April 7, 2011, and 831 square meters prior to J. F. 382 square meters divided into 1957 square meters for F. F. 18, January 18, 2011, and divided into 1957 square meters for K. 17 square meters, 1735 square meters for L. 160 square meters, and F. 1957 square meters into f. 1863 square meters and 94 square meters for M.

C. On March 6, 2012, Defendant C decided to sell to the Defendant corporation the purchase price of KRW 400,000,000 for KRW 806 square meters prior to the date of 391, KRW 563 square meters prior to H, KRW 47, KRW 392 square meters prior to I, KRW 1863 square meters, KRW 1735 square meters in K, and KRW 1110 square meters in G (hereinafter “instant real estate”). However, on September 15, 2011, the secured obligation of the establishment of a mortgage, which was completed on September 30, 201, was acquired by the Defendant corporation (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

According to the instant sales contract, on April 16, 2012, Defendant C had the permanent domicile registration office of the Daegu District Court No. 9190 (hereinafter “instant registration”) received on April 16, 2012 on the ground that the instant real estate was traded on March 3, 2012 in the name of the Defendant Corporation.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 through 7, 4, and 7, part of the witness N, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant corporation

A. Since the sales contract of this case, which is the primary cause of the claim, has the grounds for invalidation as follows, the defendant corporation shall take procedures for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the real estate of this case to the defendant C on the grounds of the restoration of real name.