The defendant is innocent.

1. On June 10, 2013, around 22:55, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to E (the age of 17) from the D convenience store located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, which is a juvenile, to the juvenile E (the age of 17).

2. The Defendant asserts that, although there was a fact that he sold alcoholic beverages to E at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, he sold alcoholic beverages to E, a single-sel year, and that E was unaware of whether he was a juvenile.

Therefore, it is examined whether the defendant was aware of the fact that E is a juvenile at the time.

1) According to the witness E’s witness E’s testimony, there is a circumstance to deem that the Defendant was aware of the fact that E is a juvenile. ① At the time of remaking or writing at the convenience store operated by the Defendant, the Defendant was 10 times prior to the occurrence of the instant case. At the first time, the Defendant was engaged in personnel management, and the Defendant was able to see that it is difficult for the Defendant to conduct an identification inspection, and the Defendant was able to do so. At this time, the Defendant was flick, and she was flick, and she was flickly and well-known, even though the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was a juvenile, the Defendant was flickly and well-known without an identification card. ② There was no other 23 times for purchasing alcohol or tobacco, and there was no convenience that the Defendant was running by any other flive witness at the time of the instant case’s testimony.

① At the instant convenience store in the diameter of the year (2012), the Defendant told that “it was too difficult for the distribution industry to work in the distribution industry, several strings and stairs are string, and hing off and hing off.”

Distribution business whose father is the father at the time.