logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.12.06 2018고단1345
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch.

1. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 23:24 around 23:24, 2018, driven a motor vehicle from the road front of the 190-day Municipal Ordinance of 0.180% of alcohol level in the influence of alcohol level; (b) was collected from the road front of the 190-day Municipal Ordinance of 0.180% in the same city to the same city, and driven a motor vehicle from the C

2. Although the Defendant violated a provision prohibiting driving of alcohol twice or more, on June 5, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car at the section of approximately 100 meters from the cafeteria of the Municipal Ordinance of Macheon-si to the 2-lane 91, reputation, reputation, and front of the road, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.109% during the blood transfusion at around 23:24, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry, a copy of a summary order;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Act and Articles 148-2(2)2 and 44(1) (i.e., self-driving on May 21, 2018), Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) (ii) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (within the scope of the sum of long-term punishments) to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act include the Defendant’s records of the crime (such as the record of punishment for drinking at least three times in the past), the nature of each of the crimes in this case, the time interval of each of the crimes in this case, the degree of alcohol concentration of the Defendant at the time of driving of each of the crimes in this case, the circumstances and circumstances of each of the crimes in this case, the family relationship of the Defendant, and whether the Defendant’s family relation was reflectd, and other various sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and changes of the crime in this case shall be determined in full consideration.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow