Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

[In accordance with the Act on Activity Assistant Services for Persons with Disabilities], a person with a disability who, alone, is unable to lead a daily life and social life due to physical or mental disability, etc. may be provided with activity support allowances (services such as activity assistance, visiting bathing, visiting nursing, etc.).

When a disabled person intends to receive an activity support allowance, the activity support allowance will be provided by an activity support institution affiliated with an activity support institution by visiting a residence of a disabled person. At the time of commencement and termination of the activity support allowance, the activity support allowance hours are recorded by making contact with the voucher card possessed by an activity support institution and the voucher card possessed by a disabled person on the pay time record terminal possessed by the activity support institution, respectively.

When an activity support allowance fee is claimed to the head of a local government based on the hours of activity support allowances recorded by the activity support personnel as above, the head of a local government shall pay the expense to the activity support personnel according to

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A is the mother of C(30 years of age) who is the recipient of activity support allowances as a mental retardation first degree, and the defendant B is the person who provides the activity support allowances to C as an activity support worker for the disabled who belongs to (g)D.

Although Defendant B did not actually provide activity support allowances, the Defendants recorded false benefit hours as if they provided the activity support allowances, recorded wage hours in excess of the actual benefit hours, and conspired to use the benefits in installments by claiming the benefits in Busan City on the basis of this, and Defendant B sent the device for the activity support hours in his possession and the voucher card to Defendant A at will. Defendant B allowed Defendant A to record the benefit hours received from Defendant B at will.

Defendant

A shall be the defendant of the Nam-gu, Busan, from September 15, 2015 to 09:24 of the same day.