(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.19 2019고정677

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.19 2019고정677

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 33 years of age) are legal divorce relationships.

At around 22:50 on July 20, 2018, the Defendant moved the victim from the D-dong underground parking lot of the C Apartment to the E-learning Vehicle in his name, brought the victim from the vehicle, and tried to talk with the victim, but the victim attempted to talk with the victim, but the galthmpian 8 mobile phone owned by the victim was taken after deducting the victim from the galthmpian 8 mobile phone owned by the victim and damaged the property equivalent to 760,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged, around July 20, 2018, the Defendant recommended the victim to return home at the Ddong and underground parking lot of the Dadong apartment in Sungsung-si to the outside of the victim, but, on the ground that the victim was unable to respond to it, he saw the victim as both arms on the ground that the victim was shakinged, and moved the victim into the Elearning vehicle in his name for dialogue with the victim and moved the victim from the vehicle to the adjacent vacant lot in his name, and tried to talk with the victim, but the victim attempted to talk with the victim, such as cutting down both arms of the defective victim, skeing the victim, and booming him.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.09.22 2016고합21

-대전지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고합265

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2015.05.20 2014고합44

-제주지방법원 2020.01.09 2019고합169

-대전지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단2218