logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.09.26 2013고단839
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) led the Defendant to go through the breath of the military base in the vicinity of the etwit distance, which is located in the Sinposidong of Sinpo City, in the state of being drunk of 0.108% of alcohol concentration from blood on the 01:00 on June 25, 2013.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely by reducing speed and keeping it well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to the shock of the back part of the victim B (the 57-year-old taxi) driving that was parked in the signal signal route at the front part of the said high-speed taxi, and led to the shock of the part of the victim D (the 55-year-old taxi) driving that was parked in the front of the said taxi due to the shock, while the said taxi was pushed in the front, and the rear part of the E-bit-Ra motor vehicle of the victim D (the 55-year-old taxi) who was parked in the signal route.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim B, such as salt ties, clifals, and clifals, which require treatment for about 2 weeks, from the victim FF (the 34 years of age) who is the son of the above taxi, and suffered injury to clifal salt clifs, etc. requiring treatment for about 10 days, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said clifs to cover 7,102,196 won, even though the said clifs were damaged to cover 2,545,946 won for repair costs, respectively, and escape without taking necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.108% at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1.B, D, and F.

arrow