logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.01.26 2015고단3937
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On December 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 19, 2012.

[Criminal Facts] Around December 2013, the Defendant became aware of the Victim E who works in a singing room near the D market located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and he is operating his steel company.

At the same time, I tried to acquire money from the damaged person by overfusing as if he had refluence.

On February 8, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A female employees embezzled the company’s public funds to operate a steel company located on the separate side of South Korea-U.S., and the Financial Supervisory Service could not pay money to the Defendant by suspending the company’s passbook, and that the Defendant would refund money to the Defendant who borrowed money.”

However, the Defendant did not operate a steel company, and no accounting employee embezzled the company’s funds or suspended the passbook from the Financial Supervisory Service. From February 2005, the Defendant did not have a certain occupation in the state of bad credit standing and did not have any intent or ability to repay the loans even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of a certain occupation in the state of bad credit standing.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million from the victim’s wife F account on the same day to the Defendant’s wife account on the same day, and took over KRW 107,06,000 from that time through March 5, 2015 by means of the foregoing method, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from March 5, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against G (including the E part of the statement);

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Each letter, details of transactions, and each member trading account;

1. The investigation report (the Stockholm content and the report.

arrow