1. The Defendant’s disposition of extending prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on June 23, 2014 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Details of the disposition

From 1997 to 3,726,80,00 won in total, 3,726,80,040 won in global income tax, 4 capital gains tax, 110,892,60 won in total, 121,790 won in comprehensive real estate tax, and 3,726,80,040 won in total.

(A) The Defendant issued a disposition of prohibiting departure under Article 4(1)5 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 8726, Dec. 21, 2007) with respect to the Plaintiff on April 27, 2007; (b) from April 27, 2007 to October 18, 2007; and (c) on December 12, 201, the Defendant issued a disposition of extending the period of prohibition of departure under Article 4(1)5 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 10863, Jul. 18, 201); and (d) extended the period of prohibition of departure under Article 13(2)5 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201); and (d) extended the period of prohibition of departure from the Plaintiff on December 21, 2013 to 203-14.

[Grounds for recognition] The purport of the disposition of this case is to prevent the plaintiff from having difficulty in compulsory execution, such as leaving the Republic of Korea, by allowing the delinquent taxpayer to escape property overseas. The purport of the disposition of this case is that the disposition of this case is legitimate.

The plaintiff is subject to the disposition of prohibition of departure for a long period of time due to the bankruptcy of the business in 197.

Although there is no concern about the flight of property overseas due to the lack of property under the Plaintiff’s own name, the Defendant issued a disposition of this case extending the period of prohibition of departure of the Plaintiff, so the disposition of this case shall be revoked as unlawful.

The Immigration Control Act was amended by Act No. 8726 of Dec. 21, 2007.