logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.12.09 2015고단6256
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch on July 24, 2008, and was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the same court on July 24, 2008, and was engaged in drinking driving twice or more. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant was driving a sea-glar in line with his blood content B under the influence of under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 300 meters on the road from August 22, 2015 to the back of the long-term investigation distance of about 131 way in Incheon, Namdong-gu, Incheon.

2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person who is engaged in driving of the Dogglar.

On August 22, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, as described in Paragraph 1, driven the above van, and proceeded with the road in front of the long-term 131-lane, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, with two-lanes from the long-distance distance to the long-distance 40km long-distance.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly drive the front line and to safely drive the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was driven by the victim C (year 27) who is in the atmosphere of signaled one lane in accordance with the stop signals due to the negligence of driving a central line while under the influence of alcohol, and was driven by the Defendant in front of the collision that the Defendant driven by the victim C (year 27) in the opposite line.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dump, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C.

arrow