logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고정80
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of one million won as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court, and on January 7, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on two occasions other than that of the same kind of force sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On December 3, 2016, the Defendant driven a Category C liquid sports vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 1k and about 0.143% of alcohol in blood, from the front of the luki apartment house in the Dong of Gyeongcheon-si, which is located in the same city of compost, to the roads of Schlage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving in the main place, report on the circumstances of the driver involved in the main place, response to a request for appraisal, report on detection of the driver involved in the main place (blood collection result), and report on interrogation of the suspect against the

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (applicable legal review and report on the same kind of force);

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Considering that the Defendant’s health condition is not good and living conditions are difficult for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good, and the blood alcohol concentration is considerably high, and the punishment equity with other persons who have committed the same kind of crime, etc., the amount of fine determined by the summary order cannot be deemed to be excessive, and thus, the sentence is determined as per Disposition.

arrow