A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Gwangju District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On January 4, 2020, around 22:35, the Defendant driven D 2 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.088% in the section of about 5 km from the roads near the B apartment in the Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City to the C apartment parking lot in the Gwangju Metropolitan City.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) reported that police officers belonging to the Gwangju Mine Police Station around the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Agency located in the Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, under the influence of alcohol at the same time and at the same time while driving a Doknche 2 car under the influence of alcohol as stated in the preceding paragraph, the police officers of the Gwangju Mine Police Station were under the influence of alcohol driving control, bypassing the drinking control as it is, and led the roads near the F in the Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju Mine Police Station, from the front bank of the applicant bank, to the ebbb

At this point, since there are many vehicles parked around the road, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front left, and accurately manipulating the steering and brakes to the defendant engaged in driving business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went on to the right side of the Defendant’s course, which was parked on the right side of the Defendant’s course, and shocked into the front part of the instant car driving by the Defendant.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant destroyed a car owned by the victim due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant did not immediately stop the car and does not take measures such as confirming the damage caused by the immediate stop, even though the car was damaged to be in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,176,120.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;