logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.01.30 2014노716
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The defendant, at the time of the occurrence of the accident in this case, reported the left left and left turn turn, but the court below convicted the defendant on the premise that the defendant was the left turn to the red signal, and the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a Cgner vehicle.

At around 08:20 on August 29, 2013, the Defendant made a left turn to the left one-lane from the side of the Orari-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si.

It is a private-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by signal, etc.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the direction of signal apparatus in the intersection where traffic control is performed by signal signal etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left without violating the signal on the front left-hand signal, and obstructed the course of the front-hand turn turn turn-on car driving by D(E, 55 years old), which violates the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn signal from the front side of the road which is the left-hand side of the front-hand driving direction of the front-hand driver's vehicle, and received the front right-hand side of the front-hand turn-hand side of the front-hand driver's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of crypum finites, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to D (ma, 55 years of age).

B. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel are consistent from the investigation agency to the court of the original trial and the court of the first instance, and the Defendant’s defense counsel is proceeding at the time of the instant accident one-lane from the inside of the public interest.

In order to reach the intersection of the area outside the U.S. Si/Eup (hereinafter referred to as the “instant intersection”), the signal apparatus is the front line.

arrow