1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement or image of Eul evidence No. 1 to 9 in the judgment of the court of first instance, the land of this case was used as local highway L from the time of Japanese colonial era to the time of Japanese colonial era, and this constitutes the current national highway M, and the entire purport of the pleadings in the statement and image of Eul evidence No. 1 to 15 (including household numbers). The land of this case was used as local highway L from Japanese colonial era to December 27, 196, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 2845 of Dec. 27, 196, "No. 1 to 18 of the judgment of first instance," and "No. 3 of the judgment of first instance as to "No. 1 to 2 of the judgment of first instance," and "No. 1 to 3 of the judgment of first instance as to "No. 1 to 4 of the judgment of first instance" were included as "No. 1 to 5 of the judgment of first instance as "No. 1 to 3 of the judgment". 1 to be included. 5 of the above.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be justified, and the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.