1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The reasoning of the court's reasoning concerning this case is to be stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to adding ", December 22, 2012," "No. 2012" to "No. 12, 2012," and "the fact that it seems possible to re-entry the Republic of Korea" under Article 19 of the 4th 19th , "the plaintiff can re-entry the Republic of Korea." On September 28, 2002, 200, 2009, 200. The plaintiff shall accept it as it is, under Article 12 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201), after entering the Republic of Korea as the short-term use (C-2) qualification of Article 12 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Oct. 29, 2003.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.