1. The part of the judgment of the court below as to Defendant H is reversed.

2. Defendant H is punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

3...

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Prosecutor 1) In regard to Defendant G, Defendant G was guilty of mistake of facts (Defendant G and H) and Defendant G, Defendant 1-B of the facts stated in the lower judgment.

The court below acquitted the participants of this part of the facts charged on the ground of the judgment, although it interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by the police officer belonging to the previous North Korean Provincial Police Agency on the public safety and maintenance of order by using the power of organizations or the general public at the time and place stated in the port, and violated the rules of compliance. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment

B) Although Defendant H used the side glass of Q Q, which belongs to the police patrol team of the former Jinjin Police Station, to walk three times at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) of the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the court below rendered a not-guilty verdict on this part of the facts charged. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts and affected the conclusion of the judgment. (2) The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment. (3) The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of unfair sentencing (with respect to the Defendant A, G: four months of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, one year of a fine, one million won of a fine, and two million won of a fine: Defendant C, F, H, I, and K; each fine of KRW 2,00,000; Defendant D; and each fine of KRW 3,000,000,000; Defendant J; Defendant J; Defendant M; 80,000,00 won of each fine).

B. The sentence imposed by the court below against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On November 18, 2011, the summary of the facts charged A) against Defendant G is as follows: “AB”; “AB, B, C, AC, D, AE, and AE”; “AB,” “C, AD,” “11. 22, November 24, 201; “00:0-24:00 on December 10, 10, 201”; “the front line square, front line square, front line square, and one-lane and delivery prior to AF Party”; “the front line and delivery”; the method and course of demonstration”.