1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, who acquired the Defendant’s promotion of public works and the project site consultation, paid compensation as indicated in the following table to the Plaintiffs, who are the owners of land located in the Sungnam-gu N in the above project site, for J, K, L Road Packing projects (hereinafter “instant road projects”), M residential environment improvement projects (hereinafter “instant M projects”), and the new center construction projects for senior citizens’ clubs attached to the instant M projects (hereinafter “instant center construction projects”), and acquired the land owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each of the instant land”).

A C BD E F H IO Q Q ZVV M M M T T M K L L

B. On June 28, 2002, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and publicly announced the N & AB housing site development area of Seongbuk-gu N and AA as a planned area for AB housing site development (Public notice AC of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation), the Korea Land Corporation and the Korea National Housing Corporation (the Korea Land Corporation and the Korea National Housing Corporation were merged on October 1, 2009).

The Korea Land and Housing Corporation in total before and after the merger.

AB district housing site development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing site development project”);

2) On June 20, 2003, the Minister of Construction and Transportation approved and announced a development plan for the instant housing site development project (Public Notice AD of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation), and on November 28, 2003, approved and announced the alteration of the planned area, approval for the housing site development plan, and implementation plan for the instant housing site development project.

(Public Notice AE. 3) Each land of this case is included in the site for the housing site development project of this case. 【No dispute exists with the ground for recognition, Gap’s 1 through 5 (if there is a number, each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings including each number, etc.).

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The road project of this case, which is the previous project due to the housing site development project of this case, is all the road project of this case, M project, and senior citizen center construction project.