1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. D is registered as the owner of the Gyeonggi-do Forest E-gun of Gwangju-do (hereinafter “instant old land”) in the Forest Survey Division prepared in the Japanese occupation period of July 29, 1919 (eight years in Taiwan).

B. The previous land was already restored on May 31, 196 and divided into J, B, and C on October 29, 1983, and was divided into Gwangju-gun J, B, and C on March 21, 2001 following the change of the administrative district name, and became the land of Gwangju-si B road No. 79 square meters, C20 square meters of roads (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), and J forests, etc. as indicated in the order.

C. On March 14, 1981, the Defendant (the Office of Administration) completed each of the instant real estates registration of ownership preservation (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership preservation”) under the name of the Defendant, the Suwon District Court Sung-nam Branch of Busan Branch of District Court on June 14, 1996, received on June 14, 1996, pursuant to the procedures for publication of designation of national highways as prescribed by the Road Act.

A) Around September 13, 1958, D died on or around September 13, 1958, and since D died without her child, D’s wife succeeded to D’s Australia and assets independently. (ii) L died without her child on March 25, 1969, and children such as D’s tea F et al. were jointly succeeded to D’s assets.

3) AF died on September 18, 1989. Before the F’s death, the Plaintiff, etc., who was the child of the network G, inherited the network F’s property by inheritance on behalf of the Plaintiff, etc., and jointly inherited the network F’s property with F’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that one of the co-owners jointly inherited the old land of this case, which is owned by W of W of W, and thus, one of the co-owners is a preservation act, and the defendant is seeking registration procedure for cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership of this case, which is void as

B. Registration of preservation of ownership of one parcel of land.