The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal each sentencing (the punishment of the lower court shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months);

2. The judgment below held that the defendant's partial crime is committed, the defendant's fighting of the restaurant customers seems to have been committed by contingency while working in the restaurant operated by the fraud and his/her father, and the degree of injury suffered by the victims is not much weighted, the victim E does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant was punished once a fine is imposed for other crimes in Korea, the defendant does not have any other criminal records, and the defendant's health is not good, taking advantage of the favorable circumstances, that the defendant's act of inflicting a bodily injury on the victim E, who is a restaurant customer by his/her own illness, and the defendant's act of inflicting a bodily injury on the mother part of the victim F by his/her own disease is a dangerous crime that may threaten human life. In particular, since the defendant's act of inflicting a bodily injury on the part of the victim F by his/her own ward, the defendant's act of inflicting a bodily injury on the part of his/her mother by his/her son, the victim's injury suffered by his/her fel in the shoulder disease is not less than 4 meters of the chest.

Although the defendant is required to fully deny the crime against the victim F and did not make any effort to recover the damage, the defendant's question is considered disadvantageously, and the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime were determined by comprehensively taking into account.

However, when the defendant committed the crime against the victim F who was denied by the court below, it is recognized in the appellate trial that all of the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflects the depth of the crime of this case. The defendant agreed the victim E in the court below smoothly and agreed the victim E in excess of the F. The remaining victims did not want the punishment of the defendant, and the health status of the defendant.