logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.09 2016나38596
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) As to the instant land, the land research division drafted during the Japanese occupation period entered into the land research division stating that “373 square meters in Gyeonggi-gun Co., Ltd.” was subject to D. The said land became “123 square meters in Nam-si, Namyang-si” following the change of administrative district (hereinafter “instant land”). The Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership on December 11, 1961 for the instant land on its own future.

(B) At the time of registration of preservation of ownership, the land category of the instant land was changed to “the answer” on March 17, 1986, although the land category was “the previous” at the time of registration of preservation of ownership (No. 8205) of the Namyang District Court’s receipt, but the land category was changed to “the answer.”

2) The duplicate of the repayment ledger states that the F residing in “E” has completed the repayment after receiving the distribution of “G previous 373 square meters.” 3) The “farmland Schedule” column in the Land-Wol Register is written by F as the recipient of “C 373 square meters.”

4) The farmland subdivision is written by the FF in the “E” as a farmer of the “B land 373 square meters. 5) The farmland distribution farmland registry in both Yang-gun is written by the J in the “E” as a distributed farmer of the “G preceding 373 square meters.”

C. 1) With respect to the Plaintiff’s father, F, the father of the Plaintiff, was born from Myang-gun N, and was divided into Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, on April 16, 1969, and died on March 10, 1980. 2) The Plaintiff is the father of the said F, and the Plaintiff was the father of the said F, together with other co-inheritors, jointly inherited F’s property.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 8 evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 6 (including paper numbers), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 Plaintiff’s father, F, the father of the Plaintiff, is distributed with the instant land redeemed.

arrow