1. From June 23, 2015 to January 29, 2016, the Defendant’s KRW 21,000,000 to the Plaintiff and its related KRW 6% per annum from June 23, 2015 to January 29, 2016, and from January 30, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 4, 2013, Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd., the Defendant, a company engaged in the business of dismantling structures, etc. (hereinafter “instant construction”) in the process of dismantling and demolishing structures from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Remodeling Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction”).

1. Subject matter of sale: The subject matter of the instant construction contract (other than cable cables, cable cables, equipment pipes, and escalators) was subcontracted. The Defendant of the instant construction contract and the Plaintiff entered into a scrap sale contract as follows:

2. Replacement of the contractor: D of the above site, drawn up on November 8, 2013, and us, shall be deemed null and void, and the contractor shall be replaced at the request of the other party to the contract.

3. Period of contract (out of place): From November 4, 2013 to August 31, 2014 (within the time the removal works are completed).

4. Trading amount: Gold million won (excluding KRW 150,000,000/Additional tax).

5. Payment: Until November 19, 2013

6. Other matters: The plaintiff will not make a blanket re-sale for the subject matter of this sale to a third party, and the plaintiff shall be liable for all matters arising from re-sale, including civil and criminal responsibilities.

2) On November 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff and the instant construction works consisting of scrap metal and non-performance metal (referring to scrap metal and non-performance metal, etc. traded in solid form; and (b) the Defendant is referred to as “definite” in the relevant industry; and (c) the Defendant is referred to as “definite”

2) The Plaintiff’s sales contract to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(3) The sales contract of this case was originally concluded with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) on November 8, 2013, as set forth in paragraph (2) of the above contract, and the contract was null and void and the contract was concluded again with the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is the E.

B. The Plaintiff, upon the completion of the instant sales contract, was in accordance with the instant sales contract.