Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of interference with business is acquitted. The factual facts out of the facts charged in the instant case.

Part not guilty (the point of interference with business)

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged was known that the Defendant was aware that there was a person engaged in C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-S-C-C-C-C-C-on February 14, 2008, and it was found that, on the bulletin board, “F-C-C-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S.

2. The gist of the defendant's and his defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's expression of opinion about the victim G G's method through the notice of this case cannot be viewed as spreading false facts, and it cannot be viewed as

3. In order to establish the crime of interference with business by spreading false facts, there must be “a statement of fact”, and the Defendant’s simple opinion or value judgment does not constitute a statement of fact. Here, “a statement of fact” is a concept compared to an expression of opinion, whose content is value judgment or evaluation, and is time and spatial.