A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was on the street in front of the D, located in Sinsan-dong, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si; (b) the Defendant was reported and sent to the Rab Kab Kaf, and the police station affiliated with the Sinsan-dong police station, which was called by the Defendant after receiving a report that the Defendant was suffering from the disturbance in the above Lb Kaf-si, left the place of business by cutting off the Defendant’s brea to enable

Doese gue gue gue gue gue gue gue

“In resistance with the Defendant’s cell phone put the Defendant’s cell phone into Australia, or assaulting the Defendant’s cell phone at one time by assaulting the Defendant’s left her cell phone at one time, thereby interfering with the police officer’s performance of official duties, such as the handling of reported cases, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who performs his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Jan. 1, 201; 201Do1114, Feb. 1, 201