logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.03.29 2018고합480
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In accordance with facts duly examined by this court, the facts charged are partially revised without due process of modification of indictment to the extent that it does not infringe the defendant's right to defense.

At around 19:09 on September 27, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was fluencing in the Korean language, and fluencing in the C, was committed compulsorily by force against the victim D (the 17th age), who is an employee in the Kabter at around 19:18, and flucing in the 19:18, the Defendant was flucing his hand by her hand and fluencing the fluent hand of the victim without any choice, and fluencing the fluent hand of the victim with his left hand, walking the clothes retail with the victim’s right hand, and using the arms through rhhing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police statements of D;

1. Application of convenience store-TV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the fact that a defendant has no record of criminal punishment against a sexual crime, the registration of personal information of the defendant, and the completion of a sexual assault treatment program can be seen as having the effect of preventing recidivism by the defendant; the defendant's age, family relationship, social relationship, the crime of this case, the details and circumstances of the crime of this case, and other various circumstances, such as the benefits expected by the disclosure or notification order, the effect of preventing a crime, disadvantage and anticipated side effects, etc., where the disclosure or notification of

1. An order of restriction on employment;

arrow