The defendant shall be innocent.

On September 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) heard that, from a nameless person who assumes the director of B Bank C at a low interest rate, the Defendant borrowed money to KRW 5 million from the nameless person who assumes the director of B Bank C on or around September 14, 2018; (b) opened a transaction performance with low credit rating, thereby raising credit; (c) sent money to the head of the Tong to create a transaction performance. If a person enters the head of the Tong, he would find the money and send the money to the employee who sent him; and (d) hearing the word “Seeeman Islands”; and (c) there is insufficient awareness that the nameless person was taking part in the principal offender who could specify the type of crime; and (d) there is a lack of awareness that the mere illegal payment stated in the facts charged is insufficient for the Defendant’s criminal intent.

Recognizing the fact that the defendant intended to use the defendant's account in order to handle the account, he thought that the defendant's Bbank account was offered to the person with poor name.

On September 14, 2018, on the same day, at around 11:25, 2018, the personnel in charge of the name scam lending misrepresentation to victims E, and “Korea Asset Management Corporation was selected as a person eligible for credit guarantee from the National Diplomatic Fund. It is intended to provide a loan to the Korea Asset Management Corporation at the rate of 4.8%. It is intended to provide a loan of KRW 45 million in the event of repayment of a loan in the existing use.” On the same day, the staff in charge of the name scaming remittances from the victim to the above B bank account of the Defendant on the same day.”

The Defendant, at around 12:26 of the same day, withdrawn KRW 14.5 million at the home point of B Bank G located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and gave the Defendant a good name to the employees of Bosing singing singing singings.

Accordingly, the Defendant aided and abetted the commission of fraud by the staff of Bophishing.

Judgment

The Defendant is consistently engaged in the two-time investigations, prosecutorial investigations, and court trials.