(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고단1371

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고단1371

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 10:00 on December 28, 2014, the Defendant re-entered E Real Estate in Yansan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with the effect that “The date of 5:50,000 won per 50,000 won per 5,000 won per 50,000 won per 1 year,” from the victim C (or 48 years of age). At the end of the year, the Defendant borrowed money from customers at the end of the year and year. If you do not pay money, the Defendant left the customers. The Defendant is unable to pay the entire money to the customers due to shortage of money due to the lack of money fraud. That is, the Defendant is able to pay money to the customers if money is paid.”

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay interest as agreed and return the principal.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 4,250,000 won from the victim to the account in the former bank account in the name of his father G on December 30, 2014.

2. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would necessarily pay the principal and interest on KRW 15 million, including KRW 5 million, to the clients at the same time and at the same place as, and at the same time and place as, December 31, 2014.”

However, in fact, even if the victim receives money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay interest as agreed and return the principal.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 10 million won from the victim to the account in the former bank account in the name of the said G from the victim, i.e., the victim.

3. On January 5, 2015, the Defendant, at the same place as before and after the preceding paragraph, made an investment in total of KRW 35 million to the said victim at the same time as before and after January 5, 2015, with the purport that “a total of KRW 35 million is invested, and the interest rate of KRW 5 million is the same during one month.” In addition, the Defendant’s false statement to the effect that there is the head of the

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단1807

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.10.05 2016고단920

-부산지방법원 2014.12.11 2013고단6983

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.03.21 2013고단1652

-수원지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고단2846