Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that the part of the 8th court's 3 to 8th court's 8th court's 8th court's 2nd court's 2nd court's 2nd court's 2nd court's 8th court's
B. The part of the lawsuit on the lawsuit is deleted, and the judgment on the Defendants’ assertion on the qualified acceptance by the Defendants in Article 2(c) is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except as stated in Article 2(b) below, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts used for repair;
A. In full view of the following facts: “The Plaintiff’s assertion that the amount of damages claimed by the Plaintiff is losses in proximate causal relation with the cancellation of the contract of this case due to the impossibility of the performance of the contract of this case and there is insufficient proof as to whether the amount of damages claimed by the Plaintiff was actually actually incurred.” However, in the case of service cost (Evidence A7) and design cost (Evidence A8), it is not sufficient to recognize that the amount of expenses directly related to the contract of this case is expenses directly related to the contract of this case in light of the time of payment, size of amount, etc., and the mere fact that the participating company was in a special relationship with the Plaintiff is difficult to directly recognize the amount of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff due to the cancellation of the contract of this case, the Plaintiff’s assertion on the portion exceeding KRW 20,000 of the pre-determined amount of damages cannot be accepted.”
B. (1) The Defendants asserted that “The Defendants’ assertion on the qualified acceptance claim by the Defendants is limited to the scope of the property inherited from the Deceased, even if they are liable to the Plaintiff according to the rescission of the contract in this case.”
(2) The inheritor may make a simple acceptance, qualified acceptance, or renunciation within three months from the date on which he becomes aware of the cause of inheritance (Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act), provided that the inheritor is entitled to do so.