1. The defendant's amount of increase for each plaintiff's attached Form 1 (No.4-1) to the plaintiffs, each of the money described in "No.4-1", and the plaintiff 1.

1. Basic facts

(a) Business name - Business name: AG Treasury renewal project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”) - Public announcement of project implementation authorization and public announcement of changes: H on November 8, 2012 and public announcement of Seongbuk-gu on April 24, 2014; Defendant:

(b) Each expropriation ruling by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (1) 1 through 29 - The expropriation ruling date: August 22, 2014 - The details of compensation (Provided, That this shall not include Nos. 9 AJ, No. 10 AK - Attached Table 2.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

The term "land subject to expropriation" in each of the plaintiff's "land and its ground obstacles - Compensation for losses: Each money recorded in the "Adjudication on Expropriation" for each of the same plaintiff - The date of commencement of expropriation - The amount recorded in the "Adjudication on Expropriation" for each of the plaintiff - the date of commencement of expropriation - October 2, 2014 - The date of adjudication on expropriation : October 24, 2014 - Each land and its ground obstacles described in the "Adjudication on Expropriation" for each of the plaintiffs in the attached list 2: The date of commencement of expropriation - The amount of money recorded in the "Adjudication on Expropriation" for each of the same plaintiffs - the date of commencement of expropriation - December 12, 2014.

중앙토지수용위원회의 각 이의재결 - 이의재결일 : 2015. 7. 16. - 손실보상금 : 별지2 목록 <보상내역> 중 원고별 ‘이의재결액’란 기재 각 돈, 다만, 원고 1은 이의재결액이 ‘67,057,030원’임 갑 제1호증의 1의 제2쪽 '물건합계'란 = 주택 조적조 스라브 65,750,000원 철구조 224,000원 담장 세멘브럭 256,000원 적벽돌 스라브 474,610원 샷시조 352,420원

D. Meanwhile, on June 22, 2013, Plaintiff 14 succeeded to No. 101 of the first floor of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul and two parcels, which are subject to expropriation from AL, and Plaintiff 20 also succeeded to the Seongbuk-gu Seoul AO subject to expropriation from UNFCCC.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The compensation determined by the expropriation ruling and the ruling on objection with respect to the land expropriated due to the project of this case and the obstacles on the ground of this case does not reach the legitimate compensation.