A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant and the Defendant jointly committed the crime of crime between the Defendant and the Internet (hereinafter “PP”) demanding that the Defendant pay back a cultural gift certificate that he lent to B for the purchase of money used for the game prior to the fact that he had become aware of through the “PP game,” and that he would also withdraw money that he/she sold in a false way at the same time.

No. 30

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant sold a A5 mobile phone at the gallon ju City without intent or ability to sell a mobile phone.

“Along with the announcement of this article, “A” deceivings the victim C who reported and contacted the above writing and received KRW 88,000 from the new bank account (D) in the name of B, and B transferred the said money to the post office account in the name of E under the direction of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the above victim in collusion with B.

2. The Defendant’s sole criminal defendant, around August 15, 2016, sold merchandise coupons at a price of 88% without the intention or ability to sell merchandise coupons.

“The victim F, who reported and contacted the above writing, was accused of the victim F, thereby remitting KRW 70,400 to the new bank account (D) in the name of B.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Each statement of F and C;

1. Details of the entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea, and contents of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. Application of the statutes governing transfer confirmation certificates, the Kakao Stockholm dialogue content, and the posting of a multiple tamper;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Taking into account the fact that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are several times the criminal records of the defendant, it is as ordered.