The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court's punishment (one year and eight months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In light of the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment on the grounds that no new data on sentencing have been submitted to the Defendant in the trial court, and there was no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment. In full view of the various reasons for sentencing as expressed in the instant pleadings, including various circumstances considered in the sentencing, the lower court’

It does not seem to be too unreasonable.

In particular, it is more so in view of the fact that drug crimes are highly harmful to the society due to the addiction of narcotics and the concentration of crimes, etc., the necessity of punishment is high, the crime of this case is committed during the repeated crime period, and the defendant has already been punished for the same kind of crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.