logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고단6606
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for three months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) An industrial waste discharger shall dispose of wastes generated from his/her place of business by himself/herself, or by entrusting them to a person who has obtained permission or reported thereon;

Nevertheless, from May 18, 2013 to September 19, 2013, the Defendant entrusted the disposal of approximately 1,020 tons of inorganic sludge (25.5 tons x 60 tons) generated at the site of aggregate production in a corporation B operated by the Defendant, which was located in the wife F at the time of business, to D (ju) without obtaining permission or filing a report for waste disposal business.

(b) A person who discharges industrial wastes prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment shall enter the matters concerning the delivery and receipt of wastes into the “system”, the electronic information processing program, whenever discharging such wastes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant discharged approximately 1,020 tons of inorganic waste, which is a commercial waste, in the date and place mentioned in paragraph (1), and did not enter the matters concerning the transfer and takeover into the “system”.

2. The Defendant A, the representative of the Defendant, committed a violation in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place.

3. The defendant C shall not reclaim or incinerate wastes at a place other than the waste disposal facilities permitted, approved or reported;

Nevertheless, from May 18, 2013 to September 19, 2013, the Defendant buried approximately 1,020 tons of inorganic waste (25.5 tons x 60 tons) generated from the aggregate production site in the Gyeonggi-si Group G G in Gyeonggi-si, which was located in the above aggregate production site in the plan for the resolution of the dispute settlement in a farmland, for the purpose of filling it into farmland, not waste disposal facilities.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place, violated the Defendant’s business affairs, as described in paragraph (3).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. An accusation, a written confirmation of a violation, and

arrow