Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000 for each fine of KRW 700,000,000 for Defendant C, Defendant D and F, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the chairperson of the Gu U.S. Branch, the chairperson of the JJ, the defendant C and the defendant F respectively, the members of the JJ branch, the defendant E and the defendant A are the chief director of the K K branch site.

In 2012, at the large-scale headquarters of the Korea Industrial Complex Corporation, after receiving an application from the company located in the Gu and America from the company in 2012 to promote the project for the structural sophistication of the Gu, K filed an application for the project for the structural sophistication of the Gu and the contents of the application are confirmed to be the sale site and the construction of multi-use sales facilities, such as department stores, was confirmed to be in the site. As the establishment of large-scale sales facilities was confirmed to be in the site, K union, the I-U branch, J and (State) K union, which is the group of micro enterprises in the Gu and America, expected to suffer from the loss of sales reduction

Around 10:00 on June 19, 2013, the Defendants belonging to the known organization decided to hold discussions related to the above agency business in the second floor conference room of the Korea Industrial Complex Corporation in the second floor of the Korea Industrial Complex Corporation in order to hold the above agency business in the name of the "Gu-Seongsan Industrial Complex Policy Discussion for the purpose of enhancing the competitiveness of the Si-U.S. Si-U. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S."

On June 19, 2013, at around 09:50 on June 19, 2013, the Defendants attended the “original urban and rural communities policy meeting” held by the victim L Co., Ltd. at the second floor conference room of the 2nd floor of the Gyeong-si branch of the Korea Industrial Complex Corporation located in the 164 Si/Gu, Dong-si, 164, and the Defendant B appeared together with the members of the Imi branch and opened it on the part of the members of the Imi branch, and before the debate begins, the Defendants cannot recognize the debate that is not agreed between the union and the deceased without any notification.” The Defendants’ use the microphone of the Imi, thereby inducing the acts of interfering with the debate, and Defendant C J.