logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.01.29 2014고단1665
야간주거침입절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

From September 2007 to June 2013, A worked in the “F” operated by the victim E, who is a partner of the Dong in the Chungcheongnam-gun of the Chungcheongbuk-gun, and was engaged in the mixing of raw materials, which is a core product manufacturing the E-ray.

The Defendant, upon the retirement of the said company, had been aware of having obtained the manufacturing technology of “responching singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing singing sing

1. On July 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance by using the key in the office of the victim E of the Haba (Haba) Haba (Da 101) Haba (Haba) on July 7, 2013; and (b) intruded the Defendant with three copies of the agreement prepared by I and E and the name of the business partner.

2. As stated in paragraph (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, Etc. (Joint Intimidation), there was an agreement on May 4, 2012, stating that “I working for Han L&C” technology was to receive benefit in return from E in return for providing technical advice in the course of developing the technology “lejin soft” technology.

The Defendants thought that when the L&C becomes aware of the terms of the above agreement, they would be able to suspend transactions with E or dismiss I, and conspired with victims I to inform the victim I that they have the above agreement.

Defendant

B, around January 2014, Cheongju-si, J apartment 7 Complex I was sent a copy of the above agreement to the victim I, thereby failing to comply with the Defendants’ request, the Defendants took an attitude to inform the company of the above agreement if they did not comply with the Defendants’ request.

The Defendants jointly threatened I as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant A

arrow