A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a Crails car.

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.131% during blood transfusions, and led the Eel road in front of the Maurel road D at Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, bypassing it to the yellow mar from the front side of the square typology.

At the time, it was difficult at night to view the front door, and the place was a tri-distance intersection, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and keeping the right and the right on the front door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the part on the left side of the G rocketing car driven by the victim F, who was standing in the above intersection due to the negligence of bypassing it as it is.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above rocketing car to the extent of KRW 991,604, the repair cost, such as the front door painting, and escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle and without taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a cream car as set forth in paragraph 1.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.131% while driving the said vehicle, caused a traffic accident as described in paragraph 1 while driving the said vehicle, and the person who was unable to know the identity of the witness was her escapeed from H-si driving. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant got off the said taxi and stopped the vehicle on the road in front of the 1-lane B-ri church in Yeonsu-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, 2016.

In this case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a pedestrian or not by checking well the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, it is not possible.