logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단2913
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on August 5, 2017, the Defendant: (b) Daun-Saun car owned by the Victim C that was parked in front of Sungwon-si B, Sungwon-si; and (c) Dauna car, under the influence of alcohol, cut off the window of driver’s seat with drinking without any particular reason; and (d) broken down a line of 50,00 won at the market price.

2. At the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring the victim to “shot, ringing, and bitching bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” who was sent to the police station E box in the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station, the Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, on the ground that he was urged by the victim F, a police box affiliated with the police station E box in the Gyeongnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to return home.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Complaint;

1. A report on the occurrence of a disaster and a report on internal investigation (such as dispatch of the site to the scene);

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the scene of crime, and damaged boom photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on September 24, 2015 by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Changwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on February 26, 2016, and the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation. However, the nature of the crime is not good in that the defendant committed the crime of this case. However, the degree of damage caused by the crime of this case is not much serious, and the victim C did not bear much weight in the degree of damage caused by the crime of this case, and the defendant did not have any criminal record more severe punishment than the above criminal record.

arrow