logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.19 2015가합70948
이사보수 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 168,620,403 as well as 5% per annum from December 1, 2016 to January 19, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company that produces and sells electrical appliances, such as a Plag, dys, and laundry machine, and the Plaintiff is a person who was appointed as an internal director of the Defendant on March 22, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an annual salary contract that includes the following (hereinafter “instant annual salary contract”).

Annual salary contract (insignificant action)

3. Monthly salary (basic salary): Total annual salary amount of KRW 6,965,00 (including overtime allowances): Amount of KRW 83,580,000: Contract annual salary amount of KRW 83,580,000.

(2) Monthly benefits shall be paid by calculating a day based on the date of employment, and the probationary benefits shall be applied to the probationary period.

(3) All allowances not included in the contract annual salary shall be paid in accordance with separate standards.

(4) A separate incentive may be granted to individuals, organizations' achievements and company's management performance.

(5) Welfare benefits, such as annual allowances, other than living allowances, shall be governed by separate standards.

(6) Where disciplinary action is taken or an order of a performance atmosphere, etc. is issued under the company regulations during the period of an annual salary contract, this contract shall lose its validity, and the contract price may be adjusted through reasonable procedures in accordance with the company regulations and standards for each relevant reason.

(B)

C. On February 19, 2014, the Defendant issued a personnel announcement stating that a standby order shall be issued to the Plaintiff. On March 13, 2014, the Defendant’s board of directors changed the assignment of the Plaintiff to a position and decided to appoint the Plaintiff as a “non-standing director without remuneration.”

On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiff did not work at the Defendant Company.

C 뉴스핌에 ‘그(피고의 전무이사 D을 말한다)는 그러면서 이번 경영권 분쟁을 회사를 배신한 사내 고문회계사(E) 및 CFO(A)와 기업사냥꾼이 합작해 벌이는 사건으로 규정했다’라는 내용이 포함된 별지 1 기재 기사가, F 이뉴스투데이에 '지난 2012년 B이 천안공장 신절부지를 매입하면서 당시 당사 CFO로 재직 중이던...

arrow