The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (for the crime of paragraph 1(a) in the form of imprisonment: four months and two years of suspended execution, and for the crime of paragraph 1(b) in the holding, six months of imprisonment) are too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the amount of damage was not so significant; and (c) the crime of paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the holding of the lower judgment is related to special larceny, etc. finalized on September 24, 2013 and concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act; (b) it is necessary to determine punishment in consideration of equity with the case to be adjudicated simultaneously under Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act

However, in light of the fact that the court below was determined by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant and that there seems to be no change in circumstances that would be different from the judgment of the court below, and the defendant has been sentenced several times of fines, suspension of execution, and punishment due to the same kind of crime. However, in light of the fact that the crime of Paragraph 1(b) of the judgment of the court below is committed again during the suspension period, the risk of recidivism seems to be high, and other various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and behavior environment, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.