1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 7, 2017 to October 31, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person operating a hospital in the trade name called Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, and the Plaintiff is a person who received an operation by being placed in the Defendant to remove the face and miscellaneous from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant operation”).

B. On November 7, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) from the assistant nurse of the Defendant hospital prior to the procedure, he/she ought to undergo a three to six-six-day therapy at intervals of 2 to 3 days; (b) at intervals of 2 to 3 days; and (c) at intervals of 2 to 2-3 weeks; (c) the instant area subject to the bridge, etc. ceases to exist; (d) the progress and time of recovery vary depending on the individual’s skin condition; (e) the average of at least one year is required to be recovered from the skin color of the person in serious cases; and (e) the written consent to the operation that “if there is still a chron, the surgery is required to be performed again

C. After receiving the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was inspected and treated by the Defendant on November 9, 2017, November 11, 201 of the same year, November 13 of the same year, and November 22 of the same year, and December 11 of the same year.

The plaintiff has taken the whole face after the operation, and the side of the operation continued to be sprinked with the sprinking distance and the symptoms of the operation.

E. Upon the continuation of the above symptoms, the Plaintiff: (a) from the Seo-gu Council for the imposition of Frane located in Gwangju E on December 5, 2017; and (b) the same year on January 29, 2018.

1. 31. 31., the same year;

2.3.For the same year;

2.9.9. The same year;

3. 5. Medical treatment was received;

On February 14, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Jeonnam University Hospital as a chloropoly chlost in chlostosis.

F. As of September 12, 2018, which was the closing date of the instant pleadings, the Plaintiff’s face status has improved frequently, and the Plaintiff’s face status has improved, and 3-4 meters away from 3-4 meters, there seems to be no special situation in view of the toilet face, but at the close, there appears to be a little difference between both sides and the spher, and the colored part of the sphered part appears to be diverse.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-6 evidence, Eul 1-1 evidence (including partial numbers) and images, and this.