logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.15 2017누86288
양도소득세부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that "No. 1, 3, 4, and 6 of the first instance judgment" shall be "No. 1, 3, and 6 of the 2nd judgment", "No. 17 of the 17th judgment shall be "the overall purport of the pleadings", "No. 10405" of the 3th half judgment shall be "No. 10405", "No. 26 billion won" of the 4th Do, "No. 260 million won" of the 111th 2nd judgment, "No. 5th 2nd 7th 5th 1st 2nd 7th 10,000,000 won", "No. 10th 16th 1st 6th 1st 6th 1st 6th 14th 1st 6th 1st 6th 14th 1st 6th 1st 14th 14th 14th 1st 2

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the sales price of the instant real estate was KRW 2.32 billion, and the intermediate payment was KRW 150 million. Accordingly, the Defendant claimed that the intermediate payment was KRW 2.5 billion, not KRW 150 million, and the intermediate payment was KRW 350 million.

arrow