beta
Text
1. As to KRW 37,042,844 and KRW 12,458,31 from January 20, 2016 to February 25, 2016, the Defendant has a relation to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts of recognition may be acknowledged by integrating the purpose of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 11:
On October 22, 2002, the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation set the repayment date to the Defendant as KRW 14,400,000 (the amount reduced later) (hereinafter “one loan”). On October 21, 2008, the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation extended a loan (hereinafter “the second loan”) with the Defendant as of October 20, 201 on the repayment date (hereinafter “the second loan”). The National Agricultural Cooperative Federation set the amount of KRW 45,000,000 to the Defendant on October 20, 201.
B. On June 24, 2014, the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation transferred the above loans to the Plaintiff and notified the Defendant thereof.
C. The Plaintiff’s loan claim No. 1 is KRW 12,458,311 with unpaid principal as of January 19, 2016, and interest amounting to KRW 9,635,392 with interest rate of KRW 18% per annum.
The plaintiff's second loan credit is 8,863,437 won in unpaid principal as of January 19, 2016, and interest is 6,085,704 won in interest and interest rate is 15.02% per annum.
2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 37,042,844, which is the sum of principal and interest of each loan, and KRW 12,458,31, which is the outstanding principal of each loan, from January 20, 2016 to February 25, 2016, the rate of 18% per annum, which is the overdue interest rate, from January 20, 2016 to February 25, 2016, and KRW 8,863,437, which is the outstanding principal of each loan, from January 20, 2016 to February 25, 2016, the amount of KRW 15.02% per annum, which is the overdue interest rate, from January 25, 2016 to February 25, 2016.
In this regard, the defendant asserts that he had satisfied all the above obligations.
However, the evidence presented by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize this.
This part of the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.