Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2017, at around 00:30 on September 21, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, in the Defendant’s residence located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Busan-do, and received a report from 112 on domestic violence, and the circumstances leading up to the D District Unit of the Seongbuk-nam Police Station D police station called out after receiving a report from the Defendant’s wife to listen to

Police Officers' dogbs, Ninna

Does they inform the applicant of such fact.

“In doing the bath theory, E was shaking the back of E by hand, and when the chest part was drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by E, who is a police officer.

2. The Defendant damaged property by taking back the back of the Victim E, such as the date and time, at a place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and taking back the back of the victim E, as his hand, and taking up one blus earphone, which was the victim’s possession, and destroying the amount equivalent to KRW 73,500 for repair costs.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of a fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendant’s mistake, and the Defendant has no record of committing a crime exceeding the same criminal history or fine, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered by taking account of all the circumstances of sentencing indicated in the record.