beta
Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, each of the defendants A.
, however, for one year from the date this judgment has become final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants are married couple.
1. For the purpose of having a criminal punishment imposed upon Defendant A, the Defendant: (a) prepared a false statement to the effect that: (b) Defendant B stolen the Defendant’s seal imprint and seal imprint; (c) forged the power of attorney; and (d) received a false statement to the Jinju Police Station on August 10, 201, which stated that “A’s seal imprint and seal imprint are stolen; and (c) received a false statement to the effect that “A’s seal imprint and seal imprint are stolen from the Defendant who is the Defendant’s complaint; and (d) completed a registration of establishment of a neighboring building No. 2005 at the time of Jinju owned by the Defendant, who forged the power of attorney; and (d) received the said false statement to the Defendant’s Public Service Center on March 10, 201.”
Accordingly, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment.
2. On August 10, 201, the Defendants conspired to file a lawsuit against the victim G in the Jinju-dong District Court of Changwon-dong 295-4, the other party to the lawsuit on August 10, 201. On August 12, 2010, Defendant B, with Defendant A’s consent on the security of 38,100,000 won borrowed from the victim, provided that the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage over the above apartment shall be completed with the maximum debt amount of 43,00,000 won of the DD building 1,205, Jin-si with the consent of Defendant A. However, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring apartment was received with the above court as the case for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the forged power of attorney, and the above court tried to obtain the maximum debt amount by deceiving Defendant B with the above court as evidence, but the victim did not actively respond to such dispute by taking place.