logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.01.24 2018고단1518
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 2, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million with a fine of KRW 4 million at the Cheongju District Court on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license). On June 4, 2008, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million with a fine of KRW 1 million for the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license). On December 6, 2007, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million with a fine of KRW 6 million.

【Criminal Facts】

around 08:30 on June 5, 2018, the Defendant driven a Dsch Rexton car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.217% without obtaining a driver's license in the section of about 1km from the front of the “C” in a considerable area of Cheongju-si to the “A” road in Cheongju-si, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Cheongju-si, and 61-1.

"2018 Highest 2544"

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA motor vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the injury caused by dangerous driving) and the Road Traffic Act.

On September 4, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of 0.108% of blood alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license on September 4, 2018, and continued to drive the said car under the influence of 0.108% of alcohol level to drive the front road in the Seo-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, in one-lane from the bank of Chungcheong University Hospital to the north-do away from the north-do.

At the time, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was installed with the center line of yellow-ray, so in such a case, the driver was prohibited from driving the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear and accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected so that the Defendant was driving in the opposite direction due to the negligence of the central line, and the Victim G (W, age 29) who was driving in the opposite direction is the left-hand side of the H SP car.

arrow