logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.07.17 2014고정543
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 22:10 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car and proceeded at a US speed by using two lanes from the contact center to the two-lane distance. In such a case, a driver of a motor vehicle shall drive the motor vehicle at a safe speed and in a safe manner, and he shall operate the motor vehicle at a safe speed and safely, and shall operate the steering zone and the steering zone and the brake system accurately and safely so as to prevent the accident in advance. While he neglected his duty of care to prevent the accident, the Defendant, while driving the motor vehicle at two lanes to three lanes, he did not neglect his duty of care to prevent the occurrence of the accident, he did not drive the motor vehicle at two lanes to the right side of the victim C (age 41) (age 41) traveling along the two lanes to the upper right side of the motor vehicle, and did not exchange the motor vehicle with the left side part of the motor vehicle and did not take necessary measures, such as speeding 20 1 to the victim, thereby causing property damage to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a survey report on the actual condition, a photograph of a victim's vehicle, photograph of the damaged vehicle, photograph of the victim's vehicle, estimate, and medical certificate stamped;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of view of failing to take measures after the damage on the market);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (limited to the punishment prescribed for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which is heavier than the punishment, but elective of fines);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow